Re: Effects of pgbench "scale factor"

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Effects of pgbench "scale factor"
Date: 2002-01-07 01:59:19
Message-ID: 200201070159.g071xJr10022@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Based on these results I think that the spinlock and LWLock performance
> issues we have been discussing are not really as significant for
> real-world use as they appear when running pgbench with a small scale
> factor. My inclination right now is to commit the second variant of
> my LWLock patch, leave spinlock spinning where it is, and call it a
> day for 7.2. We can always revisit this stuff again in future
> development cycles.

I agree. 7.3 can bring more improvements like SMP detection, dead tuple
index markers, and lock granularity improvments. They are all on the
TODO list or in the 7.3 open items list.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-01-07 02:02:47 Re: pgcryto strangeness...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-01-07 01:37:05 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem