Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Date: 2001-12-29 21:09:56
Message-ID: 200112292109.fBTL9u306133@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Another question: Is there a way to release buffer locks without
> > aquiring the master lock?
>
> We might want to think about making bufmgr locking more fine-grained
> ... in a future release. For 7.2 I don't really want to mess around
> with the bufmgr logic at this late hour. Too risky.

You want a TODO item on this?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Thornton 2001-12-29 21:12:27 DDLs in Transactions...?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-29 20:58:52 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-29 23:09:26 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-29 20:58:52 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem