From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Serguei Mokhov <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql misbehaves because of a simple typo |
Date: | 2001-12-28 19:33:00 |
Message-ID: | 200112281933.fBSJX0T05480@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > OK, here is a patch for 7.3. It clears the paren counter only when the
> > buffer is cleared. Forget what I said about recomputing quotes. You
> > can't use backslash commands while you are in quotes.
>
> I don't think this works when the command is \g because you're testing for
> the cleared buffer too early. Look at what happens under "if
> (slashCmdStatus == CMD_SEND)". The test should be after that (around line
> 489 in original copy).
Are you sure?
test=> (select
test(> \g
ERROR: parser: parse error at or near ""
test(>
I now see the next \p kills me:
test(> \p
( select
test=>
Oops, line 489 doesn't work either:
test=> (select
test(> \g
ERROR: parser: parse error at or near ""
test=>
I now remember how confusing the previous_buffer handling is. It is
this line that is tricky:
/* handle backslash command */
slashCmdStatus = HandleSlashCmds(&line[i],
query_buf->len > 0 ? query_buf : previous_buf,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
&end_of_cmd);
It works now:
test=> (select
test(> \g
ERROR: parser: parse error at or near ""
test(> \p
(select
Patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 1.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-12-28 19:43:46 | Re: Undocumented feature costs a lot of performance in COPY |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-28 18:54:05 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem (bug?) with like |