Re: (2) patch against cvs for getTimestamp() problem.

Hi Barry,

This sounds good. I've been running the new patch continously with
4 different java server programs (around 20,000 lines of code) which
rely alot on timestamps with 7.2b3 for the last couple of days. The
code was failing with the unpatched driver (and 7.2b3), so I'm
confident that the change is necessary for the 7.2 release.

If its in cvs, I'll update and test the changes again.

Tom.

On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:12:42PM -0800, Barry Lind wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I have reviewed this patch in detail (I thought I found a problem with
> it, but I was wrong :-) ). The only change I made was to your comments
> in the code. There is a reason that the YYYY-MM-DD format is supported
> (according to the jdbc spec you can call getTimestamp() on a date
> column). I have tested both the jdbc1 and jdbc2 builds on my code base
> and it works for me.
>
> Given how close we are to the 7.2 release, I would appreciate it if
> others tested any timestamp code they might have. I have applied the
> patch and built new jar files and placed them on the website.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
--
Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
tom(at)nooper(dot)com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs