From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com> |
Cc: | Brian Beuning <bbeuning(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What is the practical limitation of no multi-threading? |
Date: | 2001-12-12 02:55:14 |
Message-ID: | 200112120255.fBC2tEr21611@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Not being multithreaded may only be a big deal if your application connects
> and disconnects from the database at high rates. In that situation, such an
> application would suffer the poorer performance of multiprocess servers like
> Postgres since it is significantly more time consuming to copy the memory
> management unit (mmu) state, or at least to load a new program image (the
> backend), than with threads which share mmu state and program image.
Let me mention that we don't load new executables on backend startup.
We merely fork() the postmaster. I just checked the FAQ and it seems
pretty clear. Please let me know if there is additional info I should
have there.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-12-12 03:34:54 | Re: Inserting the current date |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-12 02:29:32 | Re: 7.1.3 XLogWrite Error |