From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Licensing |
Date: | 2001-12-05 18:48:33 |
Message-ID: | 200112051848.fB5ImXV01284@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I may have some spare hacking time coming up, and I was thinking about
> adding a PL (Scheme) to PostgreSQL. I've found some code out there
> for a small Scheme interpreter, but it appears to be licensed under a
> "BSD with advertising clause" license (as opposed to the "modern BSD"
> license of PostgreSQL). The license text includes:
>
> Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>
> Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> distribution.
>
> Would it be a problem to include this code in PG?
I think it would be fine. I don't think the old/new BSD license is any
major distinction. We moved from old to new with no issues a while ago.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2001-12-05 18:58:51 | Re: Licensing |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-12-05 18:17:39 | Licensing |