From: | Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Getting matching and non-matching results (long) |
Date: | 2001-12-05 21:54:35 |
Message-ID: | 20011205145435.A9169@cc.usu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:07:20PM -0800, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> >
> > SELECT COUNT(incident_id), drug_name, grade_name
> > FROM sds_offenders o, sds_drugs d, sds_drug_offenses do, sds_grades g
> > WHERE o.drug_p = 't'
> > AND o.offender_id = do.offender_id
> > AND d.drug_id = do.drug_id
> > GROUP BY drug_name, grade_name, d.sort_key
> > ORDER BY d.sort_key
>
> I think you need a
> g.gradeid=o.gradeid
> in the where clause as well to constrain g to
> the grade for which the offender belonged, right?
Yes, I figured this mistake minutes after sending the message to the list.
The problem is that with g.grade_id = o.grade_id there it gives me _only_
the grades that have incidents in them, instead of _all_ the grades with
0's for those without incidents.
-Roberto
--
+----| http://fslc.usu.edu USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club |------+
Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU - http://www.brasileiro.net
http://www.sdl.usu.edu - Space Dynamics Lab, Developer
"Carrier detected." Go to the dentist...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-12-05 22:05:33 | Re: Getting matching and non-matching results (long) |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-12-05 21:29:04 | Re: PL/pgSQL examples NOT involving functions |