Re: RC1 on Monday?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RC1 on Monday?
Date: 2001-11-30 21:02:25
Message-ID: 200111302102.fAUL2QA08231@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > Does anyone have anything outstanding that holds off an RC1?
> > Seen alot of changes over the past week, but mostly in the docs ...
> > haven't seen anything that I think is 'major' that would require a Beta4,
> > anyone else?
>
> The only thing I'm concerned about is Jan's report from Tuesday:
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1020754
>
> If that's real it seems like a release-stopper; but he hasn't come back
> with any more info, not even enough to let other people try to reproduce
> it.

How are we on the ports? We still have BeOS issues, right? HPUX looks
OK, I think, because it was a compiler problem.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-30 21:11:32 Re: RC1 on Monday?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-30 20:32:08 Re: RC1 on Monday?