From: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
Cc: | postgres sql list <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: date_part vs extract |
Date: | 2001-11-29 09:48:39 |
Message-ID: | 20011129094839.GB11369@rcfile.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On 29 Nov 2001 at 09:45 (+0100), Markus Bertheau wrote:
| I wonder about the difference between date_part('week', ...) and
| extract(week from ...) not only but also from a performance point of
| view. I read extract is standard and date_part is not. Backwards
| compatibility maybe justifies the existence of date_part. Whats else?
The EXTRACT syntax ends up as a call to the internal date_part(...)
function. If SQL-portability is not a concern, calling date_part()
directly should be a bit quicker.
cheers.
brent
--
"Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are
really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing." -- Duane Allman
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gary Stainburn | 2001-11-29 11:31:24 | Fixing faulty dates - select on day part of a date field |
Previous Message | Markus Bertheau | 2001-11-29 08:45:38 | date_part vs extract |