Re: JDBC bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC bug?
Date: 2001-11-26 20:13:36
Message-ID: 200111262013.fAQKDb415577@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> I haven't seen any evidence in this thread of a JDBC bug. The original
> posting refered to calls in the DatabaseMetaData classes doing
> toLowerCase(). This is appropriate because the DatabaseMetaData class
> is querying the pg_* tables to get information about database objects,
> thus since the backend stores the identifiers in lower case, therefore
> the jdbc code needs to do a toLowerCase(). The followup below is more

But the backend doesn't store identifiers in lowercase if they have
created mixed-case identifiers with double-quotes, right? I am
confused.

> of a complaint on how SQL is case insensitive and if you have created
> your objects with quoted mixed case identifiers you need to access them
> via quoted mixed case identifiers. I haven't seen any evidence that
> basic SQL operations (select, insert, update, delete) have a bug in them.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stuart Robinson 2001-11-26 20:14:32 Re: CallableStatements
Previous Message Barry Lind 2001-11-26 20:09:20 Re: JDBC bug?