From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, stiening(at)cannon(dot)astro(dot)umass(dot)edu, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bug #513: union all changes char(3) column definition |
Date: | 2001-11-22 03:53:27 |
Message-ID: | 200111220353.fAM3rRg12994@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> regression=# create table baz as select f1 || 'z' as f1 from foo;
> SELECT
> regression=# \d baz
> Table "baz"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> --------+--------+-----------
> f1 | bpchar |
>
> The argument here is about how much intelligence it's reasonable to
> expect the system to have. It's very clearly not feasible to derive
> a length limit automagically in every case. How hard should we try?
I don't think we can try in this case, especially because our functions
are all burried down in adt/. However, I don't think creating a bpchar
with no length is a proper solution. Should we just punt to text in
these cases? Seems cleaner, perhaps even throw an elog(NOTICE)
mentioning the promotion to text.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-22 04:08:37 | Re: Bug #513: union all changes char(3) column definition |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-22 03:51:04 | Re: Bug #513: union all changes char(3) column definition |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-22 04:08:37 | Re: Bug #513: union all changes char(3) column definition |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-22 03:51:04 | Re: Bug #513: union all changes char(3) column definition |