From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Eric Cholet <cholet(at)logilune(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Determining which index to create |
Date: | 2001-11-21 14:04:58 |
Message-ID: | 20011122010458.B537@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:53:09PM +0100, Eric Cholet wrote:
> I should have mentionned I tried that, but it isn't being used:
>
> => \d dico_frs_motid_date
> Index "dico_frs_motid_date"
> Attribute | Type
> -----------+--------------------------
> motid | integer
> date | timestamp with time zone
> btree
>
> => explain select * from dico_frs where motid=4742 order by date desc limit
> 10;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Limit (cost=0.00..17591.91 rows=10 width=16)
> -> Index Scan Backward using dico_frs_date on dico_frs
> (cost=0.00..20023641.63 rows=11382 width=16)
Well, it is doing the scan backwards, which is good. But it's not using the
index. If you drop dico_frs_date index, does it do it then?
Oh, and what version of postgres was this again?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Magnetism, electricity and motion are like a three-for-two special offer:
> if you have two of them, the third one comes free.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Link | 2001-11-21 14:21:27 | Re: Performance: Perl-DBI vs. PG Stored Procedures |
Previous Message | PostgreSQL List User | 2001-11-21 12:06:07 | ODBC with SSL... |