Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings)
Date: 2001-11-21 19:33:37
Message-ID: 200111211933.fALJXbu02748@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I am just really concerned that the newbe PostgreSQL user will assume
> > the performance they see with the default settings are what they will
> > judge PostgreSQL.
>
> For this kind of "newbie", the kind that doesn't read the documentation,
> this would only make it worse, because they'd assume that by making the
> choice between three default configurations they've done an adequate
> amount of tuning. Basically, you'd exchange, "I can't find any tuning
> information, but it's slow" for "I did all the tuning and it's still
> slow". Not a good choice.
>
> The bottom line is that you *must* edit postgresql.conf in order to tune
> your server. If this editing is simplified it doesn't matter what the
> default is.

Is it possible to probe the machine with and update postgresql.conf
automatically?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2001-11-21 19:52:03 Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-21 19:31:18 Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong