Re: A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary!

From: marpet(at)linuxpl(dot)org
To: "Andrew G(dot) Hammond" <drew(at)xyzzy(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary!
Date: 2001-11-21 10:25:20
Message-ID: 20011121112520.4db9a8f2.marpet@linuxpl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:08:42 +0200
"Andrew G. Hammond" <drew(at)xyzzy(dot)dhs(dot)org> wrote:

> Toss in the added benifit of not having to reboot your database server every
> couple of hours, and it's a no-brainer. Probably shouldn't be telling
> everyone this, but I make good money transitioning Access and MSSQL systems
> to Postgres.

why not? let all the people know, that it really WORKS and someone is
going to actually PAY MONEY to have someone make it work!

This is reassuring for both developers and the users :-)

regards

--
Marek Pętlicki <marpet(at)linuxpl(dot)org>
Linux User ID=162988

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message RoBSD 2001-11-21 10:38:31 Re: NOTICE: (transaction aborted): queries ignored until END
Previous Message PostgreSQL List User 2001-11-21 10:17:54 THANKS! Was: Re: migrating from MSSql