From: | "Brent R(dot) Matzelle" <bmatzelle(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary! |
Date: | 2001-11-20 19:10:29 |
Message-ID: | 20011120191029.13847.qmail@web13002.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
--- "Robert J. Sanford, Jr." <rsanford(at)nolimitsystems(dot)com> wrote:
> my personal belief is that a win32 native version of postgres
> would resolve the connection issues and allow many more people
> to adopt postgres.
I totally agree with you, but as I explain below that really cannot
happen.
> this is of course coming from someone that isn't contributing
> to the code base and will therefore only "complain" about this
> this one time and will accept any virtual beatings you care to
> deliver ;)
>
> given that i don't have any grasp of the postgres code base any
> suggestion that i offer up will be simply grasping at straws.
> i do know that the apache group has had similar problems with
> win2k and their new architecture is targeted at resolving
> multi-platform issues by providing a platform independent layer
> for networking and file manipulation. their performance under
> win2k is orders of
> magnitude better not having to go through the posix layer. my
> guess is that this required a near total rewrite on their part
> and would probably require the same on the part of the postgres
> team.
PostgreSQL is built with a multi-process model, rather than a
multi-threaded model such as MySQL. The win32 platform cannot handle
a multi-process model and probably never will (it would not be in
MS's best interests nowadays anyway). This is what makes a port a
major difficulty and would set the PostgreSQL team back months to
years in development time. IMHO it is much more important to
increase the functionality, stability, and speed of the *NIX version.
If you want to use PostgreSQL in a production environment then pick
up a copy of Linux or FreeBSD. These OSes a load easier to learn,
use, and maintain than you win32-only people would think. I am a
win32 to Linux convert so you will have to trust me on this ;) Plus,
you can use any number of GUI tools that run on win32 to manipulate
PostgreSQL: Access, Webmin, Putty, Winsql, phpPgAdmin.
Brent
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PostgreSQL List User | 2001-11-20 19:41:07 | migrating from MSSql |
Previous Message | Mike Arace | 2001-11-20 19:05:15 | Re: A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary! |