Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "P(dot)J(dot) \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
Date: 2001-11-17 05:08:16
Message-ID: 200111170508.fAH58GD27885@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Seriously, how do OS's handle partial page write, especially to
> > directories?
>
> ... fsck ...

But how can it handle partial writes to a directory when many files
exist in that single block?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-17 05:09:58 Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-17 05:02:49 Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-17 05:09:58 Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-17 05:02:49 Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)