Re: Open items

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open items
Date: 2001-11-14 16:34:18
Message-ID: 200111141634.fAEGYIk15644@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Source Code Changes
> > -------------------
> > Compile in syslog feature by default? (Peter, Tom)
>
> I consider this dead/postponed.

OK, I will add it to TODO.

>
> > AIX compile (Tatsuo)

> > ecpg patches from Christof (Michael)

The ecpg was just applied so that is done.

>
> * The last message translations should be in before RC1. Stuff that
> doesn't compile at that time will be disabled. I suggest that from now on
> no more gratuitous "word smithing" in the C code, for the benefit of
> translators -- most of our messages stink anyway, and they ain't getting
> better with two more spaces in them. ;-)

Agreed.

> * Something needs to be done about the expected file for the geometry
> test. The standard file used to work on my system ever since I can
> remember, but now something's changed (not my system).
>
> The things is that the expected file was last changed without the input
> file changing. This must not happen, IMNSHO.
>

Added to open items list.

>
> > Documentation Changes
> > ---------------------
>
> * Re-make key words table (tomorrow at the latest)
>
> * Make man pages (I'll look at that over the weekend. RC1 should be
> considered reference page freeze so I can finalize them.)

Current open items list attached.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 429 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Giuseppe Tanzilli - CSF 2001-11-14 16:41:25 Re: 7.2b2 problem using like 'XXX%' sequential scan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-14 16:33:03 Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification