From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
Cc: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Use of 'now' |
Date: | 2001-11-14 16:10:14 |
Message-ID: | 200111141610.fAEGAEu13530@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
> Regarding the TIME data type: there was never a reserved value defined
> for that type, so the feature was never available for it. Since
> 'current' and 'now' are synonymous, it is a one-liner to add recognition
> of 'current' to that type. I've got patches...
You know I am totally lost with the date/time stuff. I am just pointing
out stuff and guessing. Please do whatever you think is appropriate.
Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert B. Easter | 2001-11-14 22:10:59 | techdocs "Essential Databasing Terminology" link |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-11-14 14:11:05 | Re: Use of 'now' |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-14 16:24:50 | Re: Open items |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-11-14 14:11:05 | Re: Use of 'now' |