Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support
Date: 2001-11-13 01:30:39
Message-ID: 200111130130.fAD1UdZ21193@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Are you saying we never need to save deferred trigger events any longer,
> > or just in this case?
>
> The only reason we save 'em beyond the time they are executed is to support
> "triggered data change" detection.

I assume we still need a queue for deferred triggers, right? We just
now don't need to keep them after that like we used to, right?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-13 01:32:51 Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-13 01:28:54 Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support