Re: Can't find docs on Postgresql.conf

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can't find docs on Postgresql.conf
Date: 2001-11-07 00:28:36
Message-ID: 200111070028.fA70SaH03913@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Seems we should increase to 24 or 32. Is there a
> > downside to the increase. I can't even imagine a performance hit.
>
> Darn if I know. We should try to measure it before assuming it's
> insignificant. At the very least, it'd increase the size of pg_proc
> by about a third ...

Doesn't it store in pg_proc as an array, which is of variable length?
I think the only overhead is adding code to fmgr.c for the extra param
combinations.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-07 00:45:00 Re: Can't find docs on Postgresql.conf
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-07 00:26:17 Re: Can't find docs on Postgresql.conf