Re: Sourceforge moving from PostgreSQL to Oracle

From: Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com (Joshua Drake), pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sourceforge moving from PostgreSQL to Oracle
Date: 2001-11-06 22:19:25
Message-ID: 20011106221927.14FD02AB49@bugs.unl.edu.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mar 06 Nov 2001 18:08, Joshua Drake wrote:
> yodermk(at)home(dot)com (Micah Yoder) wrote in message
> news:<20011106084527(dot)STAI28565(dot)femail30(dot)sdc1(dot)sfba(dot)home(dot)com(at)there>...
>
> > > I seriously doubt that they are moving to Oracle. If nothing else,
> > >
> > > they won't want to pay for it. However, they probably are trying to
> >
> > Oh, they can afford it. The annual report that came in my mailbox today
> > says
> >
> > they had apprximately $83 million in cash and marketable securities at
> > the
> >
> > close of Fiscal 2001 (July I think).
>
> But what was their burn rate? How much are they LOOSING every month?

Sorry to say you guys may by wrong. I heard that SourceForge was loosing to
much $$$ that they might not get to the end of the year.
The KDE team is conserned, as they use SourceForge for all the internet
development.

I really dought they they will move to Oracle, unless Oracle puts money in
some way to overcome the loses.

Saludos... :-)

--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | mmarques(at)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Ridge 2001-11-06 22:20:12 Re: pg_dump and DEFAULT column values
Previous Message Eric Ridge 2001-11-06 22:10:45 Re: pg_dump and DEFAULT column values