From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Beta going well |
Date: | 2001-11-05 02:47:49 |
Message-ID: | 20011105114749S.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Probably not, considering it has not been announced anywhere outside
> this list. Ahem.
>
> Since we've made a number of fixes in the past two weeks, I think
> our next step should be to roll a beta2, and then actually announce it
> [as in pgsql-announce]. We can argue more about schedule after that's
> been out for a week or so.
>
> Anyone have stuff that they need to get in there before beta2?
Yes. doesn't compile on AIX 5L. I would like to fix it before beta2
(see attached pacthes below).
However I'm not sure if it's a correct solution. Problem is, AIX 5L
has sys/inttypes.h where int8, int16, int32 and int64 are
defined. Should we detect them in configure? Also, I'm afraid it would
break other AIX versions. Comments?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
*** include/c.h.orig Mon Oct 29 11:58:33 2001
--- include/c.h Mon Oct 29 12:08:13 2001
***************
*** 205,213 ****
--- 205,215 ----
* frontend/backend protocol.
*/
#ifndef __BEOS__ /* this shouldn't be required, but is is! */
+ #if !defined(_AIX)
typedef signed char int8; /* == 8 bits */
typedef signed short int16; /* == 16 bits */
typedef signed int int32; /* == 32 bits */
+ #endif /* _AIX */
#endif /* __BEOS__ */
/*
***************
*** 275,281 ****
--- 277,285 ----
#else
#ifdef HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64
/* We have working support for "long long int", use that */
+ #if !defined(_AIX)
typedef long long int int64;
+ #endif /* _AIX */
typedef unsigned long long int uint64;
#else
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-05 02:54:43 | Re: Beta going well |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-11-05 02:41:45 | Re: compiler warnings in ODBC |