| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ben-Nes Michael <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? |
| Date: | 2001-10-24 10:58:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20011024205836.B2991@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:32:06PM +0200, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> Simple.
>
> In my dynamic sites I have sessions tables that get select/update/insert
> allot, So removing as many obstacles from select/update/insert against "very
> simple" tables will improve the performance.
Well, I think you may be barking up the wrong tree. The overhead for
transactions is very low. You are under the impression that that
transactions slow the database down?
Removing transactions would basically remove the whole point of having an
RDBMS. Seriously, transactions are no performance impediment.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Magnetism, electricity and motion are like a three-for-two special offer:
> if you have two of them, the third one comes free.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-10-24 11:33:09 | Re: poor with mirrors |
| Previous Message | wayne | 2001-10-24 10:58:13 | Re: Listing users |