Re: schema support, was Package support for Postgres

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: schema support, was Package support for Postgres
Date: 2001-10-24 22:27:35
Message-ID: 20011024172734.C4469@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:43:32AM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
>
> And there's the fact that schemas were wanted for 7.2, and didn't happen.
> Withouth external adgitation, will they happen for 7.3? Given the size of
> the job, I understand why they didn't happen (the package changes so far
> represent over 3 months of full-time programming). We've got some momentum
> now, I'd say let's run with it. :-)
>

I feel much better about my unsucessfully attempt at a naive schema
implementation, last Christmas holidays: I had no where _near_ 3 months
of time in on that.

;-)
Ross

--
Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D. reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu
Executive Director phone: 713-348-6166
Gulf Coast Consortium for Bioinformatics fax: 713-348-6182
Rice University MS-39
Houston, TX 77005

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-10-24 22:41:38 Re: New default ignored by pre-exising insert rulesets.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-10-24 22:13:02 "Triggered data change violation", once again