| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martin Weinberg <weinberg(at)osprey(dot)astro(dot)umass(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using an SMP machine to make multiple indices on the same table |
| Date: | 2001-10-23 03:52:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20011023135208.A29468@svana.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 05:38:23PM -0400, Martin Weinberg wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have some big tables (1.2 billion records) and indexing is quite
> time consuming. Since we have this running on dual Athlon box, it
> would be great to make indices in parallel.
>
> On Postgresql 7.1.3, it seems that the table is locked after the
> first "create index" is started up. Is this right? Is there any
> way to do this in parallel?
My question in, would it help. The creation of the index should only be
limited by the bandwidth of the drives. I would think that creating two
indexes at the same time would simply trash the disk a lot and end up being
slower.
The answer to your questions however, are yes and no respectivly.
HTH,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Magnetism, electricity and motion are like a three-for-two special offer:
> if you have two of them, the third one comes free.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-10-23 03:56:24 | Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the selectlimit |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2001-10-23 03:15:30 | Re: Database corruption? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-10-23 03:56:24 | Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the selectlimit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-23 03:09:26 | Re: Using an SMP machine to make multiple indices on the same table |