Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-23 00:56:08
Message-ID: 200110230056.f9N0u8g04749@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
> objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes
> away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
> reasons you mention.
>
> Does anyone know if we could include ANT into our CVS and redistribute
> it in order to build the jdbc code? Are their license incompatibilities
> between the Apache License and the PostgreSQL license that would prevent
> this?

I don't think we want to go there. Too much bloat to add it. Looks
like 600k.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-23 02:34:43 Re: Ant installation (and other) issues!
Previous Message Shevland, Joseph (AU - Hobart) 2001-10-23 00:37:38 Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration