Re: compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2 (fixed

From: Dan <dphoenix(at)bravenet(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Denis A Ustimenko <denis(at)oldham(dot)ru>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2 (fixed
Date: 2001-10-17 22:19:11
Message-ID: 20011017151850.L78016-100000@gandalf.bravenet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

whats wrong with kill -9' the postmaster
works fine for me hahahaa.

> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 22:34:47 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
> To: Denis A Ustimenko <denis(at)oldham(dot)ru>
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2
> (fixed
>
> Denis A Ustimenko writes:
>
> [change -Wl,-R to -R and -Wl,-h to -h]
>
> I'm having a difficult time understanding this. Both -R and -h are linker
> options, not compiler options. So while the compiler driver might be nice
> enough to recognize them as the former and pass them through, this change
> just pushes these chances, and it doesn't add any theoretical change of
> functionality.
>
> So, if you want this to be fixed, you're going to have to start with
> explaining your problem, and then we can start looking for solutions.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-17 22:34:34 Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-17 20:46:29 Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit