Re: VARCHAR vs TEXT

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Aasmund Midttun Godal <postgresql(at)envisity(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VARCHAR vs TEXT
Date: 2001-10-13 03:54:26
Message-ID: 200110130354.f9D3sQH01372@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Aasmund Midttun Godal wrote:
>
> > I am sure this question has been answered in some form or another
> > before, but I can't really find anything on exactly this issue.
> >
> > Are there any differences between varchar and text other than
> >
> > 1. varchar has limited size
> > 2. varchar is SQL 92 text is not?
> >
> > Especially regarding performance.
> >
> > Or am I correct to assume that if you need a place to store some text,
> > and you are not sure how much (like an email address or a name) you
> > are best off using text?
>
> Pretty much yes. text and varchar are pretty equivalent other than
> the fact that varchar specifies a maximum size.

I have added the following paragraph to the FAQ:

<P>CHAR() is best when storing strings that are usually the
same length. VARCHAR() is best when storing variable-length strings,
but you want to limit how long a string can be. TEXT is for strings
of unlimited length, maximum 1 gigabyte. BYTEA is for storing
binary data, particularly values that include NULL bytes.</P>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-10-13 05:26:20 Re: GROUPING
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-10-13 02:33:46 Re: Indexes