Re: Bug #477: path ?# path

Can someone comment on this?

> Curtis Barrett (curtis(at)northwestern(dot)edu) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> path ?# path
>
> Long Description
> nothing major. the ?# (geometric intersection) operator for paths iterates over point pairs in each path testing for intersection. however, it ignores the last->first point pair for closed paths. a quick workaround is to tack the first point on the end of a closed path.
>
> Sample Code
> # select '((1,1),(2,0))'::path ?# '((0,0),(0,2),(2,2))'::path;
> ?column?
> ----------
> f
> (1 row)
>
> # select '((1,1),(2,0))'::path ?# '((0,0),(0,2),(2,2),(0,0))'::path;
> ?column?
> ----------
> t
> (1 row)
>
>
> No file was uploaded with this report
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026