Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options
Date: 2001-10-12 05:17:14
Message-ID: 200110120517.f9C5HE919047@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I don't think we can remove -o behavior during beta because it will
> > affect people using -S in startup scripts.
>
> That was *not* the proposal under discussion. The proposal was to
> warn people in the 7.2 documentation that we plan to remove -o in 7.3.
>
> AFAICS there is no backwards-compatible way to clean up these switches,
> and so the best bet is to make an incompatible change --- after suitable
> warning.

OK, it is on the TODO list so we can do it when we want to. So you are
considering only a documentation warning? I was thinking we should have
single-letter replacements installed and print a warning to the user
that the -o '-a -b -c' thing will go away in 7.3.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-12 05:33:50 Re: Glitch in handling of postmaster -o options
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2001-10-12 03:35:30 Re: CLUSTER TODO item