From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | John Summerfield <pgtest(at)os2(dot)ami(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVS changes |
Date: | 2001-10-02 16:55:26 |
Message-ID: | 20011002125455.R77860-100000@mail1.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Ummmm ... I thought we weren't going to do this, but were going to fix the
proper build process?
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > just about to be moved to the new server, now that the new 18gi drive has
> > > > > > been installed ... plan on getting that done this afternoon ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't rush. I am setting up my system to check the SGML docs every 15
> > > > > minutes and rebuild if necessary. Overnight builds are not frequent
> > > > >
> > > > Would it not be better to provide a means for developers to cause the rebuild on demand? A 15-minute wait doesn't seem convenient to me.
> > >
> > > Yep, but it takes 15 minutes to build anyway, so I figured I would check
> > > very 15 minutes and adding another 15, that makes 1/2 hour. We don't
> > > have a mechanism to build only a few html files. You have to do the
> > > whole thing.
> > >
> > > Suggestions?
> >
> > I don't know enough about how it works (or doesn't), but the
> > delay looks worse.
> >
> > Add the delay for "missing the bus" and you're out to a 45-minute
> > delay.
>
> True.
>
> > The need for on-demand is even greater, even something done
> > crudely:
> >
> > If a build's in process, flag the need.
>
> Added. I realized that I could have two running at the same time, which
> would be a disaster.
>
> > When the build completes, check if it has to be done again.
>
> Great idea! Added.
>
> > I assume that updates aren't so frequent that you'd be constantly
> > rebuilding, or so infrequently a missed rebuild would cause
> > serious problems.
>
> Yep.
>
> > Perhaps a way to check if a rebuild's in process so that if it's
> > slower than usual a developer can see it's not forgotten (or
> > who else is doing one).
>
> Script attached. I could poll cvs more frequently but it seems rude to
> hit the cvs server more frequently than every 15 minutes. If people
> want it polled more frequently, and Marc doesn't mind, I can change the
> polling interval here.
>
> Also, I added something that will show the files modified in the current
> build.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-02 16:57:28 | Re: CVS changes |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-10-02 16:42:25 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-02 16:57:28 | Re: CVS changes |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-10-02 16:42:25 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes |