From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Wolfe <steve(at)iboats(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance question (stripped down the problem) |
Date: | 2001-09-29 08:30:13 |
Message-ID: | 20010929183013.A4360@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:25:13AM -0600, Steve Wolfe wrote:
> > There is a user specifieable value somewhere that controls how expensive
> an
> > index scan is and how expensive a seqential scan is. By tuning those you
> > could probably get the effect you want.
>
> Hmmm.... nice. Can anybody point me to that value?
In the documentation, section 3.4.1 here.
PostgreSQL 7.1.3 Administrator's Guide > Server Runtime Environment >
Planner and Optimizer Tuning
There's a whole bunch of tunable variables. It does say that there is not
much idea of what values are good so any experiments would be helpful.
HTH,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Magnetism, electricity and motion are like a three-for-two special offer:
> if you have two of them, the third one comes free.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dinesh Parikh | 2001-09-29 12:22:03 | Re: Dynamic Query problem |
Previous Message | Tod McQuillin | 2001-09-29 08:07:49 | Re: Recreating unique index for primary key |