From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: multibyte performance |
Date: | 2001-09-28 06:27:22 |
Message-ID: | 20010928152722B.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I did some benchmarking with/without multibyte support using current.
> > (1) regression test
> > (2) pgbench
>
> pgbench unfortunately seems quite irrelevant to this issue, since it
> performs no textual operations whatsoever. It'd be interesting to
> modify pgbench so that it updates the "filler" column somehow on each
> update (perhaps store a text copy of the new balance there), and then
> repeat the tests.
Ok. Here is the result:
Without multibyte:
1 50.190473
2 65.943052
4 74.908752
8 62.589973
16 87.546988
32 94.448773
64 88.019452
128 64.107839
With multibyte:
1 47.473237
2 61.435628
4 83.047684
8 95.556846
16 92.157352
32 95.879001
64 91.486652
128 66.926568
a graph is attached.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
image/png | 6.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-09-28 08:24:53 | Big update for timestamp etc. |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-28 04:13:48 | Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal |