From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Gowey, Geoffrey" <ggowey(at)rxhope(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: an already existing alter table drop column ?!?!?! |
Date: | 2001-09-24 17:28:16 |
Message-ID: | 20010924132455.G58361-100000@mail1.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Gowey, Geoffrey wrote:
> damn. Is there a usable version being worked around? If so, how long before
> it is available?
too many dissending opinions on how it should (and shouldn't) be done ...
the one that was put in pre-maturely needed 2x the disk space to do ... so
if you had a multi-gig table, you had to have enough free space to store a
second copy in order to remove a column ...
there was a bunch of us that felt that it could be done better using a
'flag' on the column so that it was hidden ... and some that thought ...
etc, etc ...
> > Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:14 PM
> To: Gowey, Geoffrey
> Cc: 'Hiroshi Inoue'; Stephan Szabo; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] an already existing alter table drop column
> ?!?!?!
>
>
>
> isn't
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gowey, Geoffrey | 2001-09-24 17:35:05 | Re: an already existing alter table drop column ?!?!?! |
Previous Message | Gowey, Geoffrey | 2001-09-24 17:18:21 | Re: an already existing alter table drop column ?!?!?! |