Re: Performance question (stripped down the problem)

From: z(dot)nijmeyers(at)cable(dot)a2000(dot)nl
To: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance question (stripped down the problem)
Date: 2001-09-20 11:39:30
Message-ID: 20010920133930.A18305@node10065.a2000.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:10:02AM +0200, Herbert Liechti wrote:
> I tried it. See my actions below. The main performance boost is
> reached by creating an index and disabling the sequential scan:
> Without any index;
> real 0m18.128s
> user 0m0.010s
> sys 0m0.010s
>
> Same statement with index
> real 0m18.259s
> user 0m0.020s
> sys 0m0.010s
> no difference
>
> now disable seqscan:
> time psql tt <<END
> set enable_seqscan = off;
> real 0m3.701s
> user 0m0.010s
> sys 0m0.000s

same here (dual PIII-866, Debian, 512 MB, raid1+0)

real 0m6.472s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.010s

real 0m6.195s
user 0m0.010s
sys 0m0.000s

real 0m2.885s
user 0m0.010s
sys 0m0.000s

tinus

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-09-20 12:00:22 Re: anoncvs troubles (was Re: CVS vs anoncvs)
Previous Message Christof Petig 2001-09-20 10:46:13 Re: anoncvs troubles (was Re: CVS vs anoncvs)