From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: factorial doc bug? |
Date: | 2001-09-12 01:38:58 |
Message-ID: | 20010912103858F.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Are you saying we should remove the whole chapter below from the docs?
>
> Hmm. I wrote that :/
>
> I vaguely recall some discussion of this topic (a few months ago?). I'm
> not certain that the current behavior was an intended result of changes
> in the "automatic coersion" algorithms, but I think it was. Tom Lane is
> probably the person who made those changes, and we should have him in
> the discussion on whether the current behavior is appropriate.
>
> Keep in mind that he is a mathematician, and I'll guess that he won't
> have much patience with folks who expect a result for a factorial of a
> fractional number ;) But there may have been another case which made it
> clearer that the old behavior was a bad road to take. We can look at the
> archives, right?
Ok, let's wait for him coming back...
--
Tatsuo Ishii
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-09-12 01:39:23 | Re: factorial doc bug? |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-09-12 01:35:33 | Re: factorial doc bug? |