From: | Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Culley Harrelson <culleyharrelson(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: unicode in 7.1 |
Date: | 2001-09-12 00:23:40 |
Message-ID: | 20010912022340.A16896@l-t.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:39:38AM -0700, Culley Harrelson wrote:
> Ack! I guess I am hitting this problem....
>
> I had my database rebuilt to use UNICODE encoding. Data now appears
> correctly in pgsql but not when filtered through JDBC. Unfortunately Im
> using the open source DbConnectionBroker connection pooling object and I
> have to dig into this to apply the fix. It is suprising to me that JDBC
> has a problem with a database using UNICODE encoding?!? I obviously don't
> understand the internals of this stuff <grin>
With UNICODE you are claiming to JDBC 'hey, my data
is UNICODE (UTF8)'. What encoding the data fields really
are?
--
marko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Culley Harrelson | 2001-09-12 00:33:46 | Re: Fwd: Re: unicode in 7.1 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-09-11 23:48:41 | Re: MacOS X Build Fails |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Culley Harrelson | 2001-09-12 00:33:46 | Re: Fwd: Re: unicode in 7.1 |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-09-11 23:33:16 | Re: Fwd: Re: unicode in 7.1 |