| From: | "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)buttafuoco(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jim Buttafuoco <jim(at)buttafuoco(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump -C option |
| Date: | 2001-09-10 20:25:07 |
| Message-ID: | 200109102025.f8AKP7406971@dual.buttafuoco.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
will do.
> Jim Buttafuoco writes:
>
> > I am working a some patches to the code and I noticed that "pg_dump
-C
> > database" doesn't provide the database location information in the
dump
> > file. Is this correct?
>
> Your observation is correct, but the behaviour is not. Feel free to
> send a patch.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-09-11 00:25:06 | Re: [BUGS] Build problem with CVS version |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-09-10 17:55:07 | Re: pg_dump -C option |