From: | "Taher H(dot) Haveliwala" <taherh24(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: using multiple partitions for a single table |
Date: | 2001-09-08 07:55:23 |
Message-ID: | 20010908075523.27504.qmail@web13003.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks all for the suggestions. I've decided to go
with LVM. It would appear to be the most flexible
solution.
Taher
--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Taher H. Haveliwala" <taherh24(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Is it possible in postgres 7.1.3 to have a single
> > table span multiple partitions? Or is using RAID
> the
> > only option?
>
> RAID or LVM are the best scenario. If you're really
> in a bind you
> could manually move table segments to different
> partitions and set up
> symlinks from the original location. But this is a
> pain in the neck;
> also, I would not recommend doing it while the
> postmaster is running.
>
> regards, tom lane
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pmiranda | 2001-09-09 14:47:17 | Re: pg_dump & windows (what a mess...!) |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-09-07 23:09:28 | Re: FINAL: Multi-User PostgreSQL usage SECURITY |