| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: driver source code indentation |
| Date: | 2001-09-06 17:43:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200109061743.f86HhBX05938@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
> Dave,
>
> I agree with you, and it seems that much of the existing jdbc code is
> formated that way. But before starting a thread on what everybody
> prefers as their java format, let me first ask the question:
>
>
> Should the jdbc java code use the same formatting as the C code?
>
> If the answer is yes, then we know what the format is going to be. Else
> we can have what I am sure will be a long religious battle on what style
> would be best for the java code.
>
> My personal vote is to stick with the same format as the C code. While
> personally I think a different format would be better, I don't think it
> is worth the hassle, and I can live with the existing format.
>
Agreed. That is the direction I am heading.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-06 17:45:05 | Re: error - NOTICE: current transaction...MORE DETAIL... |
| Previous Message | chris markiewicz | 2001-09-06 17:40:09 | Re: error - NOTICE: current transaction...MORE DETAIL... |