From: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain) |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net (Peter Eisentraut), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL Development) |
Subject: | Re: Log rotation? |
Date: | 2001-09-06 12:33:22 |
Message-ID: | 20010906123322.8DA541A6B@druid.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Tom Lane
> Also, I kinda thought the long-range solution was to encourage everyone
> to migrate to syslog logging ...
>
> > And no, "use syslog" doesn't count.
>
> Why not?
Well, one "why not" might be that syslog is not a guaranteed delivery
logging system. It might be good enough for some applications but I
don't think that it should be forced on everyone.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-09-06 12:39:27 | Re: Is there a problem running vacuum in the middle of a transaction? |
Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2001-09-06 12:18:48 | Re: CVS access |