Re: Windows NT / Delphi

Hi,
With the Postgres NT version, we have experienced the
table-names are not shown in explorer, and naturally
it donot appears in 'tablename' property of table
component.
Cheers.
Kar.

--- Stefan Huber <s(dot)m(dot)huber(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have two questions:
> 1) What about the performance of PostgreSQL under
> WinNT (or Win2k, XP if
> somebody already has that). There is a project
> coming up, and the
> programmers want to stick to MS Windows. So are
> there any quirks with the
> Windows version? I checked the FAQ but the two known
> issues sound so good,
> that I can't believe them ;)
>
> What does "inherently insecure" mean for a
> production server (about 1GB
> database size expected and connectivity via ODBC and
> a network)?
>
> I know the ipcdaemon and I got the impression that
> this piece of software
> is not very stable (I used it for intermediate
> development while my Linux
> box was not ready). Or was it just because we had
> Postgres, MS SQL and an
> MS Access client opened simultaneously...?
>
> 2) Has anyone experience with Delphi 5 and Postgres?
>
> Any answers appreciated.
>
> greetings from Austria,
> Stefan
>
> --
> Hit any user to continue
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the
> unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to
majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

=====
>From SKAR. suvranshu_k(at)yahoo(dot)com
Good Day!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
>From pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Wed Aug 22 14:23:42 2001
Received: from tmpsmtp704.honeywell.com (tmpsmtp704.honeywell.com [199.64.7.104])
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with SMTP id f7MILjP21913
for <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from matthew(dot)copeland(at)honeywell(dot)com)
Received: from 131.127.249.22 by tmpsmtp704.honeywell.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:19:32 -0700
Received: from testgs.gaa.aro.allied.com (151.150.32.135 [151.150.32.135]) by tmpcn197.wins.allied.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id RLNLTWZP; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:19:41 -0700
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:19:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: <matthew(dot)copeland(at)honeywell(dot)com>
X-X-Sender: <e649762(at)testgs(dot)gaa(dot)aro(dot)allied(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
cc: PostgreSqlAdmin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ERROR: Conditional NOTIFY is not implemented
In-Reply-To: <13068(dot)998437540(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Message-ID: <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)33(dot)0108221318100(dot)5550-100000(at)testgs(dot)gaa(dot)aro(dot)allied(dot)com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Archive-Number: 200108/101
X-Sequence-Number: 2037

> They weren't really working right in 7.0 either, but they coincidentally
> failed to crash.
>
> I'd suggest using a trigger that does NOTIFY, instead.
>

Wonderful. I have been using them for about the last 6 months without any
problems, and now someone mentions this feature. I will look into the
trigger stuff, and see what I can figure out. Thanks.

Matthew M. Copeland