From: | Michael Calabrese <m2calabr(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Float Percision with MS Access 97 |
Date: | 2001-08-20 22:03:05 |
Message-ID: | 20010820220305.23234.qmail@web10704.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
I am sorry, but I guess I did not make my question
clear. I am not looking for greater backend precision
(ie moving to float8). There seems to be a
mis-comunication between Access and postgres with
float4.
Access is seeing the number with fewer digits than
want must be in postgres. If I do a :
UPDATE Parts SET Count = round(Count,4);
Then the access query from my first email will work.
This is a pain right now because my users will get a
write conflict error, call me, I will find the
offending field, do and Update with the round(x,4),
then it will work.
I could fix it by putting round(x,4) with all float
fields, but this seems like a poor fix.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-08-20 23:24:55 | Re: New CVS doesn't compile |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-20 20:54:05 | Re: Float Percision with MS Access 97 |