From: | Gerhard Häring <haering_python(at)gmx(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface |
Date: | 2001-08-15 19:25:52 |
Message-ID: | 20010815212552.A6238@lilith.hqd-internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:59:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > This is great. It solves a problem we were having.
> >
> > Bruce: this should go into 7.1.3 (if possible). It applies cleanly and,
> > without it, we basically can't use Python (cursors don't work, basically).
>
> We only put major lowrisk fixes in 7.1.X releases, and this one is too
> minor for the risk. Sorry.
First I'm glad that it's in the patch queue for a future version at all.
But: I don't see any risk in this patch. A source code review of the function
would show that this is an obvious fix for a stupid coding error.
Gerhard
--
mail: gerhard <at> bigfoot <dot> de registered Linux user #64239
web: http://www.cs.fhm.edu/~ifw00065/ public key at homepage
public key fingerprint: DEC1 1D02 5743 1159 CD20 A4B6 7B22 6575 86AB 43C0
reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-15 19:38:58 | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-15 19:23:46 | Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords |