| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators? |
| Date: | 2001-08-14 22:23:07 |
| Message-ID: | 200108142223.f7EMN7n25686@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Note also that there is code in there to figure out whether a targetlist
> satisfies a tuple return datatype; should we also apply automatic type
> conversion to elements of such a list? It's getting to be more of a
> stretch to say that this is being helpful rather than masking programmer
> error.
>
> But binary compatibility is easy. Shall we do that?
If we don't do binary compatible already, we certainly should.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jochem van Dieten | 2001-08-14 22:40:52 | Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT |
| Previous Message | roypgsqlgen | 2001-08-14 22:17:17 | why no stored procedures? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Giles Lean | 2001-08-14 22:24:33 | Re: [BUGS] pg_regress fails at "point" test |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-14 22:17:23 | Re: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? |