Re: Rename config.h to pg_config.h?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rename config.h to pg_config.h?
Date: 2001-08-13 16:27:50
Message-ID: 200108131627.f7DGRoK20952@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I vote for ignore. Don't tons of projects have a config.h file?
>
> That's exactly why there's a problem. We are presently part of the
> problem, not part of the solution.

But we only search our source and other includes. Who installs a
config.h into publicly-readable /include directory? Oh, I see we do.
Yes, I guess we should change it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-08-13 16:56:02 Re: PL/pgSQL bug?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-13 16:26:32 Re: Rename config.h to pg_config.h?