Re: FATAL 1

From: newsreader(at)mediaone(dot)net
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FATAL 1
Date: 2001-08-10 03:29:55
Message-ID: 20010809232954.A8034@dragon.universe
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:19:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> newsreader(at)mediaone(dot)net writes:
> > I think backends got killed instead of postmaster
>
>
> Assuming that it was a backend that got killed, the postmaster should
> certainly have seen and logged that event. What are you doing with
> the postmaster log?

pg 7.1.2.

kernel 2.4.4

I have the log. But they don't make
any sense to me.

I deliberately kill a backend
on my development box and notice
that FATAL 1 entry in the log
So I did

$ grep 'FATAL 1' log

and get a number of entries
but it is not very informative

I start my postmaster like

$ /usr/local/pg7.1/bin/pg_ctl -o "-F -i -h 192.168.0.1" start -l log

and I did not particularly adjusted the debug/log level
Only default...

Thanks

kz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message newsreader 2001-08-10 03:36:06 Re: FATAL 1
Previous Message newsreader 2001-08-10 00:58:04 Re: FATAL 1