Re: Question about todo item

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about todo item
Date: 2001-08-05 02:41:14
Message-ID: 200108050241.f752fEq07133@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I agree we should have it, but I thought the problem was that we
> > couldn't come up with an API that worked.
>
> AFAIR, no one's really tried yet. I do not recall any proposals
> getting shot down ...

I keep bugging Jan about it, since pre-7.1 and no one has come up with
an idea. I think the lack of any proposal or anyone even mentioning
they liked the idea made me give up, especially when uuencode at least
gave us binary in/out.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-05 03:11:39 Re: Question about todo item
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-05 02:38:40 Re: Question about todo item