From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Ruprecht <chrup999(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature Requests for 7.2 or 7.3 ... |
Date: | 2001-08-03 21:36:33 |
Message-ID: | 200108032136.f73LaXZ13764@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
I would hit the hackers list for active feature discussion, though you
can request features on SQL too.
> Hi guys,
>
> There are a number of features, I would love to see implemented in a future
> release of PostGreSQL, more specific, into PL/PGSQL. Is there a central
> place somewhere, where we (the PostGreSQL user community, I guess that is),
> is able to see what is planned for the future and where we can send some of
> the ideas we (constantly) have?
> It's nice to have such an active community with developers who actually
> listen to what their users have to say (I have some bad experiences with
> other systems...:).
>
> I just looked at the gram.y file for PL/PGSQL, but I have no idea what is
> actually going on there. I have a colleague here, who did compiler building
> in the past - he might understand the stuff though - maybe I can get him
> interested in implementing the one or other thing.
>
> Keep up the excellence ...
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | clayton cottingham | 2001-08-03 21:55:37 | Re: Feature Requests for 7.2 or 7.3 ... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-03 21:21:38 | Re: Re: Fuzzy matching |