Re: [SQL] Re: When PostgreSQL compliant JDBC 2.0?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ed Yu <ekyu(at)sc(dot)rr(dot)com>, PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] Re: When PostgreSQL compliant JDBC 2.0?
Date: 2001-07-26 20:59:06
Message-ID: 200107262059.f6QKx6c03038@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc pgsql-sql


Yes, we do jdbc2. Not sure about our compliance level.

> "Ed Yu" <ekyu(at)sc(dot)rr(dot)com> writes:
> > ... I've been trying to get in touch with
> > whoever works on the postgresql jdbc driver with no luck.
>
> You're looking in the wrong mailing list. They hang out in pgsql-jdbc.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-26 21:03:35 Re: /var/lib/postgres/data/base/<oid>?
Previous Message Len Morgan 2001-07-26 20:56:51 Re: concurent updates

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2001-07-27 01:39:45 RE: problem with serialization
Previous Message Barry Lind 2001-07-26 16:34:31 Re: [SQL] When PostgreSQL compliant JDBC 2.0? (Batch updates)

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Barrett 2001-07-26 21:09:24 Restriction by grouping problem.
Previous Message Ryan Littrell 2001-07-26 20:04:00 performance issue with distance function